Jay A. Skukowski

Partner
Email    PDF    VCard
P: 416-597-4888
F: 416-594-5090
  • Called to the Bar of Ontario, 2008
  • LL.B., University of Ottawa, 2007
  • B.A., Political Science, Carleton University, 2004
Jay Skukowski
 Overview

A well-rounded litigator who appreciates that cases are won both inside and outside of the courtroom, Jay is both a fearless advocate and expert negotiator. Clients appreciate his ability to know when to push forward and when to settle, resolving cases effectively, efficiently and with his clients’ best interests in mind. Judges have noted that Jay’s presentation in court and thorough submissions “were of great assistance to the court”, and his civility towards his opponent and the court is “a model to be followed by those who appear before our courts".

Jay’s practice focuses primarily on personal injury law, including defence of product liability, occupiers' liability, municipal liability and serious motor vehicle accident claims. He also expertly handles large property loss and environmental claims along with construction, architectural, and engineering claims.

Jay has successfully litigated cases before all levels of court in Ontario. Just 3 days after being called to the bar, he argued his first appeal, won, and in so doing clarified the law on defence medical examinations in personal injury cases (Ceh v. Culver). Only a few months later, Jay went to the Court of Appeal, winning a case that involved interpreting whether two teenagers engaged in horseplay was an intentional act (Mitsios v. Aviva). In 2010, Jay achieved the rare feat of obtaining leave to the Court of Appeal, and won the eventual appeal which upheld the dismissal of an action wrongfully brought against his psychologist client who was a court-appointed expert in a family law matter (Van de Vrande v. Butkowsky).

Jay has been involved in groundbreaking decisions in Ontario and the cases he has argued have been reported in the province and country's most significant law reports such as the Ontario Reports and Dominion Law Reports. He has successfully obtained an order for security for costs against a plaintiff corporation seeking over $50 million in damages and had that claim dismissed when the plaintiff failed to post the security (AGC v. Rizzo). He has successfully dismissed a plaintiff’s claim seeking millions in damages from an explosion on the basis of misnomer (Roni v. Kenworth Trucks). He has won countless summary judgment motions, most recently applying the new summary judgment test in a chain-reaction motor vehicle action where credibility was in issue (Nadeau v. Peters).

Jay is also a regular speaker, presenter and author on topics such as uninsured / underinsured motorist coverage, occupiers’ liability and motion advocacy. He has been called upon by legal publications to comment on legal updates relating to duty to defend applications, damage assessments in motor vehicle cases and significant decisions of Ontario’s Court of Appeal.

An active member of Risk Management Counsel of Canada (RMC), a national association of independent law firms who work together to handle multi-jurisdictional insurance law matters, Jay is one of the firm’s contact partners for that organization.

Jay is a competitive golfer and played on an NCAA-Division 1 scholarship.

 Education
  • LL.B., University of Ottawa, 2007
  • B.A., Political Science, Carleton University, 2004
 Practice Areas  Called to the Bar
  • Called to the Bar of Ontario, 2008
 Assistant  Experience
  • Galota v. Festival Hall Developments Limited, 2016 ONCA 585
  • Santocono et al v. Cox, 2016 ONSC 1950
  • Nadeau et al v. Peters, 2016 ONSC 1844
  • Nadeau v Peters, 2015 ONSC 4419
  • Galota v Festival Hall Developments Ltd., 2015 ONSC 6177
  • Roni Excavating Ltd v Paccar Inc., 2013 ONSC 5192
  • AGC Mechanical Structural Security Inc v Rizzo, 2013 ONSC 1316
  • AGC Mechanical Structural Security Inc v Rizzo, 2011 ONSC 1790
  • Case v Coseco Insurance Co., 2011 ONSC 2499, aff'd 2011 ONCA 741
  • Van de Vrande v Butkowsky, 2010 ONCA 230
  • Petgrave (Litigation guardian of) v Maheru, 2010 ONSC 1710
  • Dugas v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, [2009] OJ No 2374 (QL) (Div Ct)
  • Atlific Hotels and Resorts Ltd v Aviva Insurance Co. of Canada (2009), 97 O.R. (3d) 233 (Ont Sup Ct J)
  • O'Neill v Ferreira (2009), 176 A.C.W.S. (3d) 992 (Ont Sup Ct J)
  • Ceh (Litigation guardian of) v. Culver (2008), 170 ACWS (3d) 486 (Ont Sup Ct J)
  • Mitsios v Aviva Insurance Co. of Canada, 2008 ONCA 785

Recognition

 Speaking

Speaking

 Publications
 In the Media
 Memberships

Memberships

  • Law Society of Ontario
  • Ontario Bar Association
  • Toronto Lawyers Association
  • Canadian Defence Lawyers
  • The Advocates’ Society
DISCLAIMER

Thank you for your interest in contacting us by email.

Please be aware that contacting us via e-mail does not mean that the firm is acting for the sender of the e-mail. People do not become clients unless and until the firm agrees to act and that representation will be confirmed in a retainer agreement or retainer letter, in accordance with our usual policies. Unless you are an existing client, no information provided in an e-mail will be considered confidential. We ask that you do not send us specific questions on any matter until you receive confirmation that we are able to represent you.